Analysis of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires and its Prevention Efforts Against the Actions of the Board of Directors in Limited Liability Companies

  • Selamat Widodo Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia
  • Astika Nurul Hidayah Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia
Keywords: Responsibilty, ultra virus, limited trading company, limited liability company

Abstract

The issue of abuse of authority by company directors often occurs in companies in Indonesia. Deviations that exceed the authority of the board of directors are known as Ultra Virus. As a result of these deviations, it has the potential to cause losses to stakeholders such as shareholders, the wider community, company partners and even the company itself. In the Limited Liability Company Law, ultra virus acts can be held accountable to the Board of Directors personally, but the problem is, how the directors can fulfill the demands of the injured parties while their assets have been transferred or have been exhausted. In this writing the author uses a normative juridical approach. The result of this study is that the actions of directors who have ultra viruses have the potential to harm many parties, therefore so that these actions are not repeated there needs to be a strict supervision mechanism, because so far the supervision has only been carried out by commissioners. Internal supervision by commissioners is deemed not optimal, so it is necessary to establish by the government an institution in charge of overseeing the performance of directors in the company

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azizah, J., & Erinos, N. R. (2020). The Effect of the Board of Commissioners, Audit Committee, and Sharia Supervisory Board on Islamic Banking Performance. Journal of Accounting Exploration, 2 (1), pp. 2554-2569.
Siti Hafsah Isfardiana, Responsibility of Limited Liability Companies in Violation of Fiduciary Duty, Padjajaran Journal of Legal Sciences, Volume 2 Number 1 Year 2015 Page. 169.
Marzha Teedo DP, Transplantation of Reverse Piercing The Corporate Veil Theory in Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia, Lex Renaissance No. 2 Vol. 4 July 2019. Page 216-217.
Moechthar, Oemar. Techniques for making deeds of legal entities and business entities in Indonesia. Airlangga University Press, 2020
Irianto, F. Criminal Law Liability of Hospitals as Health Service Corporations. Sol Justicia, 4(2), 2021. Hal. 163-174.
Johny Ibrahim, The Doctrine of Ultra Vires and the Consequences of Its Application to Private Legal Entities, Journal of Legal Dynamics, Vol. 11 No. 2 Year 2011.
Kurniawan, Responsibility of Limited Liability Company Shareholders According to Positive Law, Mimbar Hukum Volume 26 Number 1 February 2014.
Kurniawan, Directors' Liability in the Bankruptcy of Limited Liability Companies based on the Limited Liability Company Law, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 24 Number 2 June 2012
Yafet Y. W. Rissy, The Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil: Provisions and Application in the UK, Australia and Indonesia, Legal Reflection, Volume 4 Number 1 2019.
Hasnati, etc, Separation of Limited Liability Company Wealth from the Wealth of Shareholders, Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors. Journal of encyclopedias.org. Volume 1. Number 1 February 2019.
Dwi Suryahartati, Ultra Vires Doctrine (Perspective of Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies), Innovative, Volume 6 Number 7 in 2013.
Published
2022-03-30
How to Cite
Widodo, S. and Hidayah, A. (2022) “Analysis of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires and its Prevention Efforts Against the Actions of the Board of Directors in Limited Liability Companies”, Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 5(1), pp. 40-48. doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v5i1.95.