Social Perspectives; Legal Policy Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-XIV/2016 Concerning Immoral Provision of Indonesia Criminal Code

  • Syafri Hariansah College of Law Pertiba Pangkalpinang
Keywords: Adultery, Constitutional Court, Criminal Code (KUHP), Lewd, Rape

Abstract

This paper examines the analysis of Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 concerning the application to extend criminal offenses in the Criminal Code (KUHP) related to adultery (Article 284), rape (Article 285), and lewd acts (Article 292). In the ruling, the Constitutional Court rejected the request for all. This verdict ends with differences of opinion among Constitutional Justices. Four of the nine Constitutional Court Justices presented dissenting opinions. Decision No. 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 is very worthy to be studied in depth, because in its decision, there is a conflict of judges based on different perspectives and methods in answering constitutional issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

An-Na'im, Abdullahi Ahmed. (1987). ‘Islamic Law, International Relations, and Human Rights: Challenge and Response’. Cornell International Law Journal Vol. 20 Iss. 2, Article 3.

Arifin Syamsul. (2012). Indonesian Discourse on Human Rights and Freedom of Religion or Belief: Muslim Perspectives. BYU L. Rev.

Chazawi A. (2005). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Chazawi A. (2007). Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Holland K. M. (1991). Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. London: Macmillan.

Lamintang T. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Lamintang T. (2009). Kejahatan Melanggar Norma Kesusilaan dan Norma Kepatutan. Sinar Grafika.

David, R. & Brierley, J. E. C (eds). (1978). ‘Major legal systems in the world today’: An introduction to the comparative study of law. New York: Free Press.

Soesilo R. (1976). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Politeia.

Faiz P. M. (2016). Dimensions of Judicial Activism in The Constitutional Court Decisions. Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 13, Nomor 2.

Faiz P. M. (2017). Judicial restraint vs Judicial activism. Majalah Konstitusi Number 130.

Turchik J. T & Edwards, K. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men and Masculinity,vol. 13.

Lara S. (2008). Male Rape and Human Rights. Hastings Law Journal.

Posner R. (1986). A Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution, Case Western Reserve Law Review 179.

Sulaiman Y. (2011). The Authority Of Islamic Courts In Aceh As The Special Courts In Settling The Disputes Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum No. 53, XIII.

Syafruddin A. (2013). Pancasila As Integration Philosophy of Education And National Character International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 2, Issue 1.

Independent, Indonesian woman endures 26 lashes for having sex outside marriage (2017) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/indonesia-woman-banda-aceh-sumatra-26-lashes-whipping-sex-outside-marriage-extramarital-affair-a7559826.html accessed 20 December 2017.

Institute for Criminal Justice, Constitutional Court Rejected the judicial review Article 284 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 285 and Article 292 of the Criminal Code (2017), http://icjr.or.id/mahkamah-konstitusi-menolak-permohonan-uji-materil-pasal-284-ayat-1-ayat-2-ayat-3-ayat-4-dan-ayat-5-pasal-285-dan-pasal-292-kuhp/ accessed 26 December 2017. The Sydney Morning Herald, Two men receive 83 lashes for gay sex in Indonesian province of Aceh (2017), http://www.smh.com.au/world/two-men-receive-83-lashes-for-gay-sex-in-indonesian-province-of-aceh-20170523-gwbeof.html accessed 20 December 2017.

Aliansi Nasional, Tindak pidana Zina dalam R KUHP 2015 http://reformasikuhp.org/tindak-pidana-zina-dalam-r-kuhp-2015/.

Published
2018-09-28
How to Cite
Hariansah, S. (2018) “Social Perspectives; Legal Policy Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-XIV/2016 Concerning Immoral Provision of Indonesia Criminal Code”, Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 1(1), pp. 36-45. doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v1i1.10.