AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUDICIAL MONITORING AND SUPERVISION URGENCY IN MAKING CLEAN JUDICIARY

  • Yulia Monita Universitas Jambi
  • Nys Arfa Faculty of Law University of Jambi Indonesia
  • Elizabeth Siregar Faculty of Law University of Jambi Indonesia
Keywords: Supervision and Monitoring, clean Judiciary, Indonesia court

Abstract

A clean judiciary is the hope of all levels of Indonesian society. A clean judiciary is a court that carries out its duties and functions based on the provisions of the applicable laws and prioritizes legal certainty, justice, and benefit. This study aims to see how regulating and changing forms of judicial supervision and warning in realizing clean justice and to answer whether other legal rules are still needed to strengthen the role of the people who participate in and monitor the judicial path. This research is normative legal research, it is a study that examines matters of a theoretical nature, principles, conceptions, legal doctrine, and legal principles related to judicial supervision and supervision in the context of realizing a clean judiciary. Meanwhile, the legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and their sources. The results of this research are a) judicial monitoring and supervision should be done in order to conduct a clean judiciary, b) monitoring and supervising are done not to intervening the results of courts decisions but as a measuring tool to what extent the decisions are fair to the society, c) there are still several judges' decisions which, according to society, are controversial, illustrating the public's distrust of the judiciary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. 2010. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Ke II, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.

Arsha Putra, I. P. S. 2017. Urgensi Pengawasan Dan Pemantau Peradilan Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Transparasi Dan Akuntabilitas Persidangan. Simdos.unad.ac.id

Atmasasmita, R. 2010. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: Prenada Media Group.

Farid, W. Kewenangan Pemantauan Persidangan. http://farid-wajdi.com/detailpost/kewenangan-pemantauan-persidangan. Accesed at 13th April 2019.

Chazawi, A. 2005. Pelajar Pidana 2. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ghai, K. K. Judiciary: Functions, Importance and an Essential Quality of Judiciary (yourarticlelibrary.com). Accesed on 27th January 2020.

Hafrida. 2014. Perekaman Proses Persidangan Pada Pengadilan Negeri Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Acara Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, Vol. 5 No. 1 Maret.

Malik. 2007. Perspektif Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 005.PUU-IV/2006 Jurnal Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang.

Munzil, F. 2017. Keberadaan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Rangka Membangun Peradilan Yang Bersih Dan Berwibawa, Jurnal Hukum Media Justia Nusantara, Vol. 7 No. 1, Februari.

Nawawi, B. A. 2010. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, 2nd Printed. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sekjen Komisi Yudisial. 2018. Buku Pedoman Pemantauan Persidangan. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Indonesia.

Rahardjo, S. 2011. Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Bandung: Genta Publishing.

Sutrisno. J. A. F. 2011. Mewujudkan Peradilan yang bersih dan Berwibawa. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Thohar, A. 2010. Desain Konstitusional Komisi Yudisial dalam Sistem Ketatanegaran Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. VII. No. 1. Maret.

Trisia, S. 2019 Pemantauan Persidangan dan Potret Unfair Trial di Indonesia. Hukumonline.com.

Undang-Undang No. 48 tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang No. 18 Tahun 2011 Tentang Komisi Yudisial.

https://www.Komisiyudisial.co.id, KY Gandeng FH Unkhair Ternate Perkuat Pemantauan Peradilan. Accesed at 13th April 2019.

Published
2021-03-31
How to Cite
Monita, Y., Arfa, N. and Siregar, E. (2021) “AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUDICIAL MONITORING AND SUPERVISION URGENCY IN MAKING CLEAN JUDICIARY”, Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 4(1), pp. 48-59. doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v4i1.42.