FRAMING STRUCTURE IN RADICAL ISLAMIC GROUP SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: CASE STUDY OF JAMA`AH ANSHARU KHILAFAH DAULAH NUSANTARA (JADKN) AND JAMAAH ANSHARUSY SYARIAH (JAS)

  • febri yanto Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: Social Movement, Framing, JADKN, JAS

Abstract

A social movement has various bases, one of them is religion. In the context of a social movement basic, religion can be an effective medium to mobilize people. Religion has a significant element to do the structural-developmental framing (framing process). The framing process can form a core of a moment and an event becoming a valuable experience. This experience will be organized to guide of doing an action. This research analyzes how the structure and the framing process that are done by two Islamic radical/extreme groups. While others analyze the framing structure from the media perspective, this research sees the actor of its social movement by taking the case study of Islamic radical organization namely Jama’ah Ansharu Khilafah Daulah Nusantara (JADKN) and Jamaah Ansharusy Syariahi (JAS). This research uses a qualitative method by doing an interview and document study as the technique of collecting the data. The result shows that other than similarity, these differences are found relating to the framing process and the structure executed by these two Islamic radical groups even though they are identified as the radical group as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benford, R.D. & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framming Processes and Social Movement: An Overview and Assesment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (1), 611-639.

BIN. (2019). Pemetaan Jaringan Organisasi Islam Radikal di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Intelijen Negara.

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Eddyono, S.W. & Anggara. (2016). Mendefinisikan Terorisme: Pemetaan dan Rekomendasi Pelapor Khusus PBB terhadap Definisi Terorisme yang lebih Komprehensif dan Universal. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR).

Hamdi, Imam. (2016). BNPT sebuat ada 2,7 juta orang Indonesia terlibat terorisme : 20 Januari 2016. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/737905/bnpt-sebutada-27-juta-orang-indonesia-terlibat-terorisme.

Junaid, Hamzah. (2013). Pergerakan Kelompok Terorisme dalam Perspektif Barat dan Islam. Jurnal Sulesana, Vol. 8 No. 2 Tahun 2013.

Kunhastian, D.D. (2017). Konstruksi Berita Dalam Majalah Tempo (Analisis Framming Pemberitaan Terorisme di Majalah Tempo Edisi Januari – Februari 2016). Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Mubarak, Zulfi. (2012). Fenomena Terorisme di Indonesia: Kajian Aspek Teologi, Ideologi, dan Gerakan. Jurnal Salam Vol. 15 No. 2 Desember 2012.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2007). Basics Of Social Research (2nd ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Sahrasad, Herdi & Chaidar, Al. (2017). Fundamentalisme, Terorisme, dan Radikalisme Perspektif Atas Agama, Masyarakat, dan Negara. Freedom Foundation & Centre for Strategic Studies – University of Indonesia (CSS UI).

Sefriyono dan Mukhibat. (2017). Radikalisme Islam: Pergulatan Ideologi ke Aksi. Jurnal Al-Tahrir, Vol. 17 No. 1 Mei 2017.

Setiaji, Koni. (2014). Terorisme dalam Bingkai Media (Analisis Framming Pemberitaan Terorisme di Surakarta pada Headline Koran Solopos Edisi Agustus – September 2013). Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Sumarwan A. (2018). Memahami Framming Gerakan Sosial. Jurnal Basis, No. 1-2, Tahun ke 67, 2018.

Wiktorowicz, Quintan. (2005). A Genealogy of Radical Islam, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 28: 75-97.

Wiktorowicz, Quintan (Ed). (2012). Aktivisme Islam: Pendekatan Teori Gerakan Islam. Terjemahan oleh Tim Penerjemah Paramadina. Jakarta: Democracy Project Yayasan Abdi Demokrasi.

Published
2020-10-04
How to Cite
yanto, febri (2020) “FRAMING STRUCTURE IN RADICAL ISLAMIC GROUP SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: CASE STUDY OF JAMA`AH ANSHARU KHILAFAH DAULAH NUSANTARA (JADKN) AND JAMAAH ANSHARUSY SYARIAH (JAS)”, Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 3(2), pp. 140-150. doi: 10.33019/berumpun.v3i2.34.